On the Creative Process

An upcoming deadline for my thesis rewrites in April means I’ll be reducing the time I’m putting into blog posts until then. There’ll be less original content, but I should still have something up every week.


Before I started working on Atomic Duck I, like many people, didn’t fully appreciate the amount of background work that goes into any creative project. While a well executed creation can look like it appeared from the creator’s mind fully formed, but there’s a large unseen creative process that takes from available media and builds something on top.

Sharing the work that has gone into the Atomic Duck is one of the reasons that I decided to start running a blog, so I have to share the Everything is a Remix series from Kirby Ferguson, a great summary of and explanation of the process of creation, with examples from music and film.

There’s a 20 minute summary of the series in the video below, but I’d recommend taking 40 minutes for the full documenary at everythingisaremix.info

2011/08 Kirby Ferguson from CreativeMornings on Vimeo.


And as a bonus, Jesse Thorn on How to Make What You Love.

Posted in Deferred Procrastination | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/mnttd

European Velomobile Tour 2013

Bigest problem facing the expansion of the velomobile market is obscurity. There are plenty of people who could see the practical advantages of using a velomobile, and would interested in owning one, but for the low number of velomobiles around the world meaning that very few people have ever heard of them, never mind about having the opportunity to ride in one.

In 2011, Josef Janning’s extremely successful ROAM (Roll Over AMerica) saw over 40 riders travel 5000km (over 3000miles) across 4 weeks of travel, going coast-to-coast, west-to-east across the USA to showcase the benefits and practicalities of velomobiles for long-distance travel. So I was very excited to read about the ongoing plans for a European tour for 2013.

Nothing is finalised yet, but on reading through the main discussion thread, I was glad to see that the tour had an organiser, a set of options for the date, and a provisional route for a 2500km (1600mile), 3 week loop through Germany, Switzerland, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and back to Germany.

Just the idea that it’s possible to ride for 100miles per day, for 4-5 days in a row, without being a trained athlete shows just how practical a velomobile is!

I’d love to be part of the tour, although I’m not going to commit to anything until I have a rolling velo, so until then, the main discussion forum is on the ‘BentRider Online forums > Roll over Europe 2013? thread and under CraftGeek’s heading, there’s a website-in-testing already up at logical-vehicles.org.

In addition to the main English language thread, there are also German, French fora too.


The best name I’ve seen so far for the tour has to be “EUROLL” but is that seems to be in use by a roller-shutter firm, maybe something like “EuRollVelo” might be more descriptive than the currently leading “Euro Tour 2013”. But that’s just my opinion…

Posted in Other Topics | Tagged | 2 Comments | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/lqhrq

Steering Assembly

I went through the steering pulley arrangement in detail last week, and here’s the whole steering assembly:

There’s additional support structure around the pulley mount on the dash panel. As it was, the length of the steering column meant that the dash panel would be very easily bent out of shape. The additional structure from the dash support spreads the bending forces, to stiffen the area.

The steering wheel’s connection to the steering column has been changed from a single bolt to three. This means that the manufacture of the column is simpler, there’s now no need to drill and tap the centre of the column, and because the pulley is attached with a keyless fastening, all the adjustment is at the pulley end.

The steering wheel tubes extend up from the steering wheel to allow either bar-end brake levers or normal bike brake levers the correct way round for the rider to hold.

Posted in Atomic Duck | Tagged | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/keupw

Solidly Mounted Steering

well, not solid, it’s no good if you can’t turn the wheel!

Before I show the complete steering assembly, I wanted to show the detail of the steering pulley, where the driver’s end of the steering cables connects to the steering wheel and how all the parts clamp up around the dash panel to allow the wheel assembly to rotate.

Steering Pulley Assembly

Steering Pulley Assembly

False Colour Assembly

False Colour Assembly

Here you can see the whole assembly, the Steering Pulley (A005_P006_R002) is in red, slotted at the top to accept the ferrule at the end of the cable. Then the cable loops the pulley once and passes though one of the holes in the background, where the side plates of the pedal assembly meet the dash panel (One cable through the panel in the background, and one looped the opposite way round the pulley and passing through one of the hole son the opposing plate — not shown for clarity). The holes also hold the termination of the cable sleeve, allowing some minor adjustment of cable tension at this point, though the major adjustment is at the wheel-end of the cable.

While the pulley geometry I’ve chosen is very similar to available V-Belt pulleys (an SPZ 63mm pulley would have similar external dimensions) I’m not using an off-the-shelf pulley for 2 reasons: Continue reading »

Posted in Atomic Duck | Tagged | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/adcyq

Is it a Car or is it a Bike?

The correct answer is probably: door number three — “neither, it’s a different vehicle that is somewhere between both of them”.

I’ve had a re-read recently of Frederik Van De Walle’s Master’s Thesis “The Velomobile as a Vehicle for more Sustainable Transportation” (freely available to download from his site); and while I’ve never used the term “Sociotechnical Frame”, I’ve come across a fair amount of misunderstanding about velomobiles while I’ve been developing the Atomic Duck where I tend to say something like:

It’s not a bike or a car, it’s somewhere in between.

Typically, a velomobile gets seen as either a type of large bike, because it uses bicycle components; or as a type of small car, because it is enclosed (velomobiles are often mistaken for being some kind of small electric vehicle). But an observer that views a velomobile as either a type of car or a type of bicycle will automatically tend towards a negative comparisons of it,

i.e. “A velomobile is not as good an automobile as a car”:

  • It’s slower than a car
  • It has less range than a car
  • There is less luggage capacity
  • It only carries one person
  • It takes more effort to travel, there is no engine.

or “A velomobile is not as good a bike as a bicycle”:

  • It’s heavier than a bike
  • It’s wider than a bike
  • It’s more expensive than a bike

But if velomobiles are seen as a separate vehicle choice, much like a motorbike is seen as being distinct from either a bike or a car, it’s easier to see where the advantages of a velomobile lie.

A velomobile has many of the the advantages that a bicycle has over a car:

  • It’s lighter
  • It’s smaller
  • Costs less to run
  • More mechanically simple, so there is less to maintain.
  • Emits less harmful emissions
  • Healthier for the rider through them exercising

And some of the advantages that the car has over the bicycle:

  • Offers protection from the elements
  • Is faster (through better aerodynamics)
  • Has more luggage carrying capacity
  • Has a greater range because of increased rider comfort.
Four Modes of Vehicle

Four Modes of Vehicle

“There are today three vehicle categories: the bicycle, the motorcycle and the automobile. The velomobile is the fourth one: the difference between a bicycle and a velomobile is like the difference between a motorcycle and an automobile (-cycle to –mobile dimension); and the difference between an velomobile and an automobile is like the difference between a bicycle and a motorcycle.” — Frederik Van De Walle, “The Velomobile as a Vehicle for more Sustainable Transportation”

Posted in Atomic Duck | Tagged | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/wavbc

LaTeX-SVG-to-PDF now compatible with LaTeX Project Structure Guidelines

I’ve pushed a couple up updates to LaTeX-SVG-to-PDF that come from some changes I made to my largest LaTeX project file.

Since I converted a long (>100 pages) document from Microsoft Word format to LaTeX, I’ve now split the file down into the separate chapters for easier editing that are all \include{}‘d or \input{}‘d from a single main file. As suggested by the LaTeX Project Structure Guidelines, this includes moving the separate .tex files into a sub-directory and putting the preamble into its own .sty style file.

Sort of like this:

LaTeX Project Structure Guidelines

LaTeX Project Structure Guidelines

To get this to generate a .pdf file properly with the LaTeX-SVG-to-PDF makefile properly needed a couple of adjustments:

  • Added a variable for the location of the sub-folder holding the component .tex files (TEX_SRC_DIR) and a for all .tex files in that directory (TEX_SRC) — the default location is ./tex/.
  • Adjusted the pdf generation inputs to rebuild if any of the component .tex files change.
  • Included any .sty files as inputs for the .pdf file so styles changes will trigger a rebuild.

(see this commit)

I also noticed that if there are any errors when a bibliography is generated, these are not output at the end of the make run so I’ve added a grep for warnings in the bibliography log file.

(see this commit)

As always, the makefile is available to downlod, use, fork, tinker and change on github.


As a special bonus this week, how to typeset a document that looks like it has been written by a crazed cthulhu cultist, including typsetting an elder sign! And yes, you could use the LaTeX-SVG-to-PDF makefile, but it’s overkill for a short, text only document…

Posted in Computing, LaTeX-SVG-to-PDF makefile | Tagged , | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/ftqrq

Bottom Bracket and Adjustment

The bottom bracket structure was not quite ready to show last week (although I put up pictures) but it’s much better this week. If you don’t feel there’s been much obvious progression from those images, you’re not alone, I keep putting in the hours on the CAD, and it doesn’t seem to change shape much!

This is exactly what should be expected though, the blocking out of the structure is like a first draft of a piece of writing. Once you have a good basis to work from, it’s all a lot if tweaking, adjusting, calculating, redrawing and moving around to finish it.

What you’re looking at is still without the cross-supports for the long members (to make then into I-beams), a rider facing chain cover and the tabs and slots to allow it all to self jig.

Chainline and Chain Guard

The images below show the dash bulkhead at the rear, but not the forward bulkhead that the front of the bottom bracket assembly attaches to, to make it all easier to see. It’s not all hanging out in space really!

Where last week’s images didn’t show the rearward chainguard, it is included here. I’d actually like to extend the guard forward towards the pedal chainring, but I haven’t got a good enough model of a pedal assembly to ensure the guard would lie between the pedal crank and the sprocket, and I’ve no idea how the clearance changes with single, double and triple front chainrings — so that’s on the “to-do” pile.

The chainguard currently covers the top-idler, the lower-front and lower-rear pair of idlers and the run of the idler attached to the arm from the bottom bracket slider (the sliding idler).

A004_R002 Chainline Assembly

A004_R002 Chainline Assembly

A004_R002 Right View with Chain Cover

A004_R002 Right View with Chain Cover

The assembly structure rises up to meet the dash bulkhead to give structural support to the area where the steering wheel will be mounted and to provide the brackets that will mount the steering cables. Expect this area to evolve as the steering assembly is re-engineered.

Adjustment

A single vertical bolt secures the bottom bracket slider (shown outlined in red), which is plated in on four sides. The bottom bracket shell is connected to the bottom bracket slider with a 1mm aluminium band that is bonded to the inside of the slider, keeping the outside profile of the slider constant. Continue reading »

Posted in Atomic Duck | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/nohsf

Chainline Progress

A hardware failure on my file-server this week has left me couple of days behind on CAD work this week, so where I expected to have a near-complete drivetrain assembly and instead, I only have the unfinished parts of one.

However, I’m putting up images of the progress as it is for two reasons: 1. It’s been a while since the last Atomic Duck update, but showing progress is almost as important as finishing; and 2. I said in response to a comment last week that I would show progress this week!

If you haven’t see the last post about chainline layout, then this sprocket arrangement might seem a little strange, but it is designed to provide 220mm of horizontal pedal adjustment, without changing the running length of the chain. This should allow for pedal adjustment for almost any adult rider without having to make any manual change to the chain length, or do any manual tensioning.

A004_R002 WIP Sprocket Detail

A004_R002 WIP Sprocket Detail

A004_R002 WIP Chainline Layout

A004_R002 WIP Chainline Layout

Posted in Atomic Duck | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/ojonz

Best Size for a Capacitor Bank of an Electric Vehicle?

A bit of a look into the future for the first post of this year. I don’t have any immediate plans to do anything electric vehicle, but the Atomic Duck could make a good lightweight EV platform, so I’ve been thinking about how the bits might fit in; specifically: What is the best size for a capacitor bank of a lightweight electric vehicle?

Now I have very little experience with electric drivetrains, so I would love to hear any answer from anyone with more knowledge; but I’ve also had a go at reasoning it out, so you should also tell me if I’m way off base too!

A capacitor bank is a large matrix of capacitors that act like a buffer between the battery and motor/generator on an electric vehicle. Capacitors have low energy capacity compared to batteries, so you wouldn’t want to use them for the only energy storage, but they do have very high charge/discharge rates that don’t affect their energy storage capacity.

As such, by placing a bank of capacitors between the motor and the batteries, the capacitor bank can discharge quickly for acceleration and then be recharged from the motor to provide regenerative braking, while the batteries supply (and receive) much lower currents to drive the motor in steady state operation and supply the energy that is lost from the moving vehicle system (e.g. through aerodynamic drag, heat, friction and noise). This lower current, constant charge and discharge keeps the batteries in much better condition than high current operation, meaning that the batteries will have longer operational lives.

I reasoned that capacitor bank that can hold the kinetic energy of the vehicle at maximum normal cruising speed would be good for a lightweight vehicle.

\[ E_{kinetic} = mv^2 \]

Therefore, a nominal 350kg vehicle with a cruise speed of 60mph (28.82 m/s) would have to have capacitors that can hold 0.25 MJ (251759 J or ≈70 W·h).

The required capacitor size is dependant on voltage:

\[ E_{storage} = \frac{1}{2}CV^2 \]

So capacitance can be calculated with:

\[ C = \frac{2E}{V} \]

At 12V, 0.25 MJ needs a capacitance of 3497 F.

Using seven 500 F (16V) ultracapacitor modules in series would give 3500 F of capacitance at a total mass of almost 40 kg (5.5 kg per module).

When I said capacitors had lower energy density, it really shows here. The ultracapacitors I’ve used for reference have an energy density of 11.5 kJ/kg (3.2 W·h/kg) compared to 108-144 kJ/kg (30-40 W·h/kg) for lead acid batteries. For instance two 30Ah, 12V sealed lead acid batteries can store ten times the energy of this capacitor bank, 2.59 MJ (720 W·h), for just under 15kg.

On the other hand though, the ultracapacitor can operate at up to 7600A (short circuit, max 60 sec) giving a maximum of 91 kJ/s @ 12 V operation. Lead acid batteries can operate at either 7A (slow discharge) or 100A (fast discharge, surge) meaning that they normally only release energy at 0.084-1.2 kJ/s.

As you can see, a capacitor bank that can hold energy required to push a vehicle to it’s cruising speed is very large, and could even have greater mass than the battery storage, but being able to regenerate ‘all’ of a vehicle’s kinetic energy in the capacitors would simplify the control strategy for recharging the battery array by making it unnecessary in normal operation.

Capacitance scales linearly with vehicle mass, but it increases with the square of speed, so lighter and lower speed vehicles have more efficiently sized capacitor bank with this approach.

The required battery storage is more difficult to calculate though, as it’s heavily dependant on vehicle use and efficiency; and I’ve not even taken into account any efficiencies, or having to regulate capacitor voltage.

Posted in Deferred Procrastination, Open Source Engineering | Tagged | 2 Comments | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/ancbo

Winter Closedown

After the inter-bank-holiday break, it’ll be all back to normal next week. Time to measure some bike parts so I can finish the new chainline structural design.

In the mean time, why not take another look at the Front Axle Assembly A002_R002 and the more recent Laser-cut Lattice Living Hinges and Lattice Hinge Test Results.

Happy New Year!

Posted in Deferred Procrastination | Leave a comment | Short URL: http://def-proc.co.uk/b/eqbja